NACUSAsf meeting
Thursday, October 14, 2004, at
Attending:
Herb
Gellis (President), Nancy Bloomer Deussen (Vice-President), Anne Baldwin
(Treasurer), Joanne Carey (Secretary), John Beeman, Dale Victorine, Lori
Griswold, Ken Takara and Bob Hall.
Treasurer’s
Report: Anne Baldwin
Anne reported that we currently have
$2,852 in the bank. She offered the following financial profile of our last
concert:
Receipts: $1068
Cost: $3342
$3000
of the above was spent on players
Hall rental and house manager:
$290
Printing costs:
$52
Complementary tickets: 7
Total audience: 114
She said we are in good shape since our
next two concerts are fundraisers and composer subsidized.
Anne reported that because of some fluke
of her computer system, she couldn’t put out mail to our group mail at Yahoo.
Herb pointed out that a few of our
prominent members have not paid their dues. He recommended having a clear
policy on this: The group decided that
only pieces by composers who have paid their dues will be considered for performance.
Dues are due on January 1st of each year. With the new treasurer at
National, we should be getting the dues-status of our members more quickly.
National
Advisory Council: Herb attended the
NAC meeting and voted on seven items. The most important was a resolve to come
up with a ‘strategic plan’ for NACUSA, submitted by NACUSA president Deon
Price. John Windsor is a strong advocate of the above. NACUSA’s mission has
been defined as ‘promoting American concert music’. Herb commented that in his
opinion we are not fulfilling this mission if our only audience is our friends.
How can we carry out this mission?
1) He said that radio broadcast was an
option under discussion at the NAC.
2) Another idea is for NACUSA to have a
booth at various annual conferences, such as the annual Chamber Music
3) We could produce a Chapter CD to represent some of our best music and/or a NACUSA CD at the national level. With this strategy, we would need to deal with performer’s rights.
Upcoming
Guitar Class
Jerry Snyder, President of the Guitar
Society has agreed to do a class for us on
Increasing
Membership
John Beeman proposed a discussion about
the merits of increasing our membership. He described the advantages that a
larger pool of composers would offer: more people to do the work, add new
energy and ideas, a wider range of styles, more money and larger audiences. The
only drawback is there would be competition for performances. I brought up the
advantage of more submissions and revealed that submissions have been low
lately, with almost no one getting rejected, in particular for the Composers
and Friends concert.
We discussed the possibility of
unqualified people wanting to join. In this case, their music just wouldn’t get
past the selection committee. John reviewed the selection guidelines:
1.
Artistic quality
2.
Involvement with the group
3.
Frequency of performance in previous concerts
Herb reminded everyone of the next score
calls for the next “Composer’s” concerts – Jan 1st for the February
concert and Jan 10th for the April one. If we don’t get enough
pieces for new second concert, we can always repeat the repertoire from
February. Herb also suggested that we ask those NACUSAsf members in advance who would be
willing to volunteer to play other composers’ pieces. This prompted
Lori suggested that I offer a workshop
on the radio-baton. There was not much interest in this idea. While I offered
to lend a spare radio-baton, it seemed that most of those present didn’t feel
like learning a bunch of new technology.
We concluded our discussion in favor of
increasing our membership. John said he would make up a flyer announcing a call
for new members and put it up on our group site so we can evaluate it and offer
suggestions before he sends it out.
Our
New Website: www.nacusasf.org
This site has more space (200 MB) and executable content capability. Its cost
is just $95 a year.
Herb asked for suggestions about how we
might use these capabilities. John said we could have a database of our music
that is available to performers. Herb said this was already implemented at
National by John Windsor. John then suggested a list of all music that’s been
performed in our NACUSA concerts. This information is already available on our
own site, but not by composer, just by concert. I suggested composers putting
up musical samples of their work. This capability is also already available at the
National site, but Herb suggested we might try a more NACUSAsf personal idea,
such as “composer of the month”, or pieces with a certain theme or
instrumentation that we can change over time. Herb said we might need
permission for copyrighted pieces and from performers. John said that the
Composer’s Orchestra, SFCCO, got samples up on the web the day after a concert.
While we were on the topic of
communication, Nancy suggested that the newsletter that Ken is going to prepare
include articles by us. She urged Ken to let people know that you would welcome
articles to include in the newsletter. This would make it significantly more
interesting.
a.
Communication from performing group to composers – This
varies a great deal between groups. Anne said that attending SFCCO rehearsals
of her piece was helpful to her. John said that composers should be able to
attend at least one rehearsal. For unusual instruments, such as the guitar, we
should invite a guitarist to be on the selection committee.
b.
Program committee Selections – John said that for the last
concert, Mark made the final selection and picked at least one movement of all
the pieces sent to him, even those with a low recommendation. Bob recommended
that the selection committee pass along to the performing group the pieces it
likes (irrespective of difficulty), but have substitutes ready in case any are
rejected.
c.
Hand-off to groups - If we are giving a group more pieces
than can be included, we should tell them that so that they don’t over extend
themselves. Nancy recommended that we just pick the best music, regardless of
difficulty. She relayed that when she was on the selection committee, Owen had
told her, “Don’t send anything that is embarrassing.”
d.
Agreement with outside group - the performing group has the
final word on whether or not they will perform a certain piece at any time in
the process. We are hiring them for a certain amount of rehearsal and concert
time, not for specific pieces.
e.
Notification of “final” pieces - Looking back at the last
concert, which all agreed was a stunning success, John voiced the opinion,
which I think many shared, that Mark decided too soon that he was going to do
all the pieces (or a bit of everyone’s effort). He added it would be a good idea
not to announce the selected pieces till he’s very sure, maybe after a reading,
if there are concerns.
f.
Rehearsal problems, remedies - We should ask the groups
that we hire to tell composers if there are difficulties. If the group says it
will perform a particular piece, but it is not working, they need to talk to
the composer about it right away to see if there is a remedy. Anne told us that
the Blossom String Quartet wouldn’t take her advice about her quartet and it
was too slow in the performance.
Etiquette
in Meetings, Rehearsals and on the Net: Expectations and Remedies
(At the time of this discussion, Bob,
Dale and Ken had left)
Herb talked to Deon Price, the President of NACUSA National, about what to do about difficult personalities; i.e. someone who is abusive on a regular basis. Deon recommended that we set up guidelines for acceptable behavior and if they are broad enough she would see if NACUSA National would adopt them for all chapters.
For NACUSAsf, we agreed that the first
remedy would be to moderate a person’s email comments to the group, and that
the president would do so. Nancy mentioned that it is standard practice for
YahooGroups discussion forums to be moderated, and that people even get banned
from some of the lists. Nancy also mentioned that as a matter of policy we need
to remind everyone that: “This is an organization of volunteers. Since we are
all working hard, undue or excessive criticism is unacceptable.”
John said some organizations have a
grievance person. Anne Baldwin agreed to
try out this new position.
Discussion about a definitive policy
still needs to continue, and Nancy and several others will be working on some
initial wording.
Meeting adjourned at 9:45.
Respectfully submitted,
Joanne D. Carey
Secretary to NACUSAsf